by Mike Ratliff
14οιδα και πεπεισμαι εν κυριω ιησου οτι ουδεν κοινον δι εαυτου ει μη τω λογιζομενω τι κοινον ειναι εκεινω κοινον 15ει γαρ δια βρωμα ο αδελφος σου λυπειται ουκετι κατα αγαπην περιπατεις μη τω βρωματι σου εκεινον απολλυε υπερ ου χριστος απεθανεν 16μη βλασφημεισθω ουν υμων το αγαθον 17ου γαρ εστιν η βασιλεια του θεου βρωσις και ποσις αλλα δικαιοσυνη και ειρηνη και χαρα εν πνευματι αγιω 18ο γαρ εν τουτω δουλευων τω χριστω ευαρεστος τω θεω και δοκιμος τοις ανθρωποις 19αρα ουν τα της ειρηνης διωκομεν και τα της οικοδομης της εις αλληλους 20μη ενεκεν βρωματος καταλυε το εργον του θεου παντα μεν καθαρα αλλα κακον τω ανθρωπω τω δια προσκομματος εσθιοντι 21καλον το μη φαγειν κρεα μηδε πιειν οινον μηδε εν ω ο αδελφος σου προσκοπτει 22συ πιστιν ην εχεις κατα σεαυτον εχε ενωπιον του θεου μακαριος ο μη κρινων εαυτον εν ω δοκιμαζει 23ο δε διακρινομενος εαν φαγη κατακεκριται οτι ουκ εκ πιστεως παν δε ο ουκ εκ πιστεως αμαρτια εστιν (Romans 14:14-23)
Do Not Cause Another to Stumble
In Romans 14:1-13 we looked at the Law of Liberty that genuine believers have in Christ. This Law is not license for licentiousness, but, rather, it is freedom to not be bound by ritual or religiosity while denying self in order to not cause strife and disunity in the body of Christ by practicing that liberty in a way that causes those with weak faith to have battles with their conscience. In this lesson we will finish Romans 14 in looking at vv14-23. This passage is actually a continuation of Paul’s teaching on this vital topic for the Church in our day.
“I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean. For if your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love. By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died. So do not let what you regard as good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. So then let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.
Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for anyone to make another stumble by what he eats. It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.” (Romans 14:14-23 ESV)
In v14 Paul makes the statement, “I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean.” This truth did not originate in Paul’s mind or intellect. It came from divine revelation. (cf. Galatians 1:12) What was the revelation? It was that nothing is unclean in and of itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it is unclean.” What does this mean?
“And he called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand:There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.”” (Mark 7:14-15 ESV)
These words by our Lord Jesus tell us that eating pork or some other dietary law exclusion is not what makes a person unclean. However, if a person believes that eating pork is a sin then that warning will be heard loud and clear from their conscience. For them to eat pork would violate their conscience. This will cause them to experience guilt. This would be a negative for them because it may very well drive them into further legalism and away from freedom.
Paul them says, “For if your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love. By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died.” The Greek word for “grieved” in this verse refers to causing pain or distress. Believers with weak faith may be hurt when they see another Christian exercising his or her freedom in a way that seems sinful within their standards. The stronger believer, in his or her freedom, may very well cause these weaker Christians to violate their own consciences. (cf. 1 Corinthians 8:8-13) However, it is imperative that the stronger believers, from a motivation of love (αγαπην) or (agape), take care not to put their weaker brethren into this position. From this motivation will flow sensitivity and understanding of the situation. This love is αγαπην which is often translated as “charity” or “charitable” in the KJV or Geneva Bibles. Remember, this form of love does what is best for the one loved, not necessarily what the one loved desires. In this case, the stronger believer sees that his or her actions, even though not sinful in themselves, could be harmful to the weaker believers. They understand the following principle, “By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died.”
Their love for the brethren is cause for them to deny themselves in order to preserve the spiritual growth of the weaker brethren. They see that it is far more important to the Kingdom to not cause this strife in the body than it is to be “free.” They understand that is also important that the things they do in their freedom not be called evil, “So do not let what you regard as good be spoken of as evil.” That would be sinful as well. Therefore, self-denial will not only help the weaker believers in their struggles with their conscience, it will not give opportunity for that which is good to be called evil. On the other hand, if that does happen then legalism rears its ugly head in the body. On the other hand, if a stronger believer goes on in his or her freedom regardless of how it hurts the weaker believers, it can cause unbelievers to blaspheme when they perceive that our faith is filled with unloving people.
“For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. So then let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.” (Romans 14:17-19 ESV)
The world sees Christianity as a set of rules tied to religious things and religious actions. However, the Kingdom of God is none of these things. Instead, it is the sphere of salvation where God rules in the hearts of those He has redeemed and saved. Religiosity, dietary rules, et cetera, are non-essentials because they are only external observances. Righteousness and peace are the products of holy, obedient living produced by the Holy Spirit. These things along with joy should mark believers both in their own lives and in their relationships with other believers. Genuine believers have an abiding attitude of praise and thanksgiving that are outside of circumstances. All of this comes supernaturally into genuine believers who have confidence in God’s Sovereignty. This attitude is also bears fruit in self-denial of freedom if that freedom can possibly cause weaker brethren to stumble.
“Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for anyone to make another stumble by what he eats. It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God. Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.” (Romans 14:20-23 ESV)
Paul repeats his exhortation for us in vv20-22, but then adds a phrase that we need to examine more closely. He says, “But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.” This statement is another exhortation that tells us that it is a sin to violate ones conscience. That which does not proceed from faith here would be the thoughts and actions that our conscience condemns. Therefore, the act of violating the conscience here would be an act of rebellion, not an act of faith. That would be sin because any act that is not of faith is sin.
SDG
To him who knows to do good but doesn’t do it, to him it is sin. The litmus test of maturity in Christ’s freedom is when a believer never publishes his freedom around other believers. For instance, I have found it interesting that those who exercise their freedom in drinking wine seem to always have to make it known somehow.
Instead of privately having a glass of wine with a meal, they seem to flaunt it and take special delight in putting it out in front of those they know will not agree. And when they converse with those who do drink wine (for example), they talk like giddy school girls, exchanging effervescent thoughts about different types of wine.
That is when you know it is flesh and not Christian maturity. I believe there are some believers who drink a glass of wine with some meals who never reveal it to others and refrain from arguing their perspective because they know the sensitivity of the subject especially in America. That to me is exercising freedom in Christ in maturity.
FYI – I do not.
That’s a good point Rick and I agree with you. Then there is the fact that the type of behaviour that you gave here will also kill one’s testimony with unbelievers.
Very good post, Mike.
It is part of Scripture that I think many Christians forget about…at least in this country. As Americans, we are so caught up in our rights that it transfers into “our rights” in Christianity. I know a well respected person who watches Harry Potter movies and I was shocked and kind of “stumbled” over this knowledge. I confronted him that it was about witchcraft which God calls an abomination. He stated that it wasn’t witchcraft and that I was breaking the Second Commandment by stating that people shouldn’t read/watch something that God had not condemned. I was somewhat hurt over the matter, and unfortunately, I don’t have as high regard to his opinion and complete confidence in his leadership right now like I use to. I know that God will work things out in His timing but I think that is just an example of how he should have said, “I won’t watch those movies because they do offend many Christians.” If he is right that there is nothing wrong with them, then God will work on my legalism. If I am right that they are evil, then he would have done right by getting rid of them because of their offense to others and most importantly their offense to God.
That’s exactly right Sarah!
Thank you for this post. As a new believer I felt a lot less liberty. I went through times of wearing long skirts always, instead of trousers, wearing a head covering. I destroyed most of my music collection. I was teetotal, anyway, just before becoming a Christian, due to drinking excesses in my youth. I am now pleased because my non-Christian work colleagues were surprised to find out that I drank wine occasionally (once or twice a year). They thought that given my religious convictions I would surely be teetotal. Yet they know that I do not get drunk. I would not drink alcohol, if I were socialising with them as many of them do drink to excess.
On reflection I believe it was needful for me to do some of the things I did. With some of the music I listened to, there was idolatry. In addition, much of it was celebrating unfettered sensuality. Now, I don’t command others to do the same as I did, but I will challenge professing Christian people to think about the content of the music they enjoy. We currently have a few young people who attend our Christian youth group, who are greatly enamoured of various kinds of rock and heavy metal music. I don’t believe that all “rock” music is automatically evil. However, the attitude of these few young people is commensurate with the rebellious attitudes of their “idols”. I don’t believe that these young people are Christians yet. There is no evidence of repentance or faith in them. They are church kids, whose parents are strong believers. I have concluded that they don’t care, because they have not come under conviction. My admonishing them not to listen to this type of music would do them no good, since their wills are not submitted to the Lord, in the first instance.
Sarah brings up another element of Christian interaction as it concerns separation and legalism. I used to be so devastated when I learned a man I respected didn’t agree with me on some point. Over 33 years I’ve learned that almost no one agrees totally with me on everything but it doesn’t affect my ability to receive from him.
I do not agree with Christian cruises which MacArthur leads but I still love his writings. Spurgeons cigars, Luther’s temper, and other examples. The important issue is how a person views Scripture and strongly teaches the tenants of our faith. Of course the new lifestyles of the emergent crowd is a different story and must be rejected, but their lifestyles are a result of their view of God and Scripture.
Your points, Mike, about judging is well taken. We can disagree with others on points of separation but that should not enter our hearts which indicates judgment. Remember, there are men who would disagree with some things we do, so we are also being judged. Our goal is to please God and if God allows us some freedom we must weigh that against the possibility of being a stumblingblock.
That is a good point you raised, Sarah.
When my family moved to AZ we started going to another C.O.C. One night the minister invited us for dinner and afterwards he took out his lottery tickets to see if he won. He called that his entertainment. We started gambling and I didn’t stop until about 3 years ago. We left that church after he got angry during a sermon about his parents not attending anymore. It was the last time our family worshiped together on a regular basis. It was all downhill from there. The minister in IA would never had done those things. When we returned to IA the minister here was gone. During the next 20 years I have been in and out of many different Churches. I consider that a good example of stumbling. Thank you God for holding on to me and drawing me into your light and truth.
Poetress,
You are right, idolatry is the issue. God wants our hearts in loving obedience. The rest is all outside of that. I was really into Progressive Rock in the 1970′s. I was just a typical lost American male who lived the way I wanted. However, in 1986 God changed all of that. He saved me. It has only be recently that I have started listening to Pink Floyd or ELP again. I have found it to be empty and Christless. As far as wine or any drinking goes, I have one or two glasses of wine perhaps once every couple of years if that often. I like wine, but I know that it can ruin our testimony with unbelievers to be seen drinking. Also, weaker brethren could be hurt by that so I abstain.
We have to be wise in this. I have found that pursuing these fleshly things only pleases the flesh. It is through this though that I have noticed how far God has taken me so that I view all of those things as childish and of no eternal value. I believe God allowed me to see that about myself to encourage me and help me teach these things.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Amen Rick!
Amen Deb!
Off subject.. A man came into the store yesterday and claimed to be reformed. He said the Church he attends has a few reformed Christians there. No good reformed Churches in IA. (a few to far away) He goes to a Church that all kinds of denominations attend. Do you think I should check it out even though it’s eciumencial ? Sorry about the spelling.
Deb,
Yes, I believe it would be okay to check it out. I attend a “Baptist” church that is not part of any denomination. It does not show up on any “Reformed” church lists, but the theology held by the leadership is equivalent to that of James White or John Piper with a great deal of John MacArthur. I would not have known that unless we visited. So, go ahead and prayerfully check it out. Listen to the Spirit as you are there. You will know if its God’s will for you or not.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Mike, I have a question which has been ‘bouncing’ around at the back of my mind for some time. Although it is wrong for strong belivers to flaunt their liberties to weaker brethren, does that mean that the weaker brethren would always have their way, so to speak. What I am refering to is for example in worship with regards to the use of Psalms, Hymns and Contemporary Songs. If someone is convinced of exclusive Psalmody, or the church is convinced of not singing contemporary songs, what can the differing parties do? Should the view of the majority be the determining factor here?
(Sorry for opening up what may probably be a can of worms…)
Daniel,
What you are describing is like, “The Tyranny of the Baby Christians.” Sorry, I couldn’t resist. Worship in Church and how church are done are leadership issues. Notice how your comment tied legalism with “weaker brethren.” This is valid. Mature worship is not found in “music,” but in the words sung whether accompanied by music or not. I attend a church where we sing mostly hymns with a few more modern hymns thrown in from time to time. The common denominator in that is that lyrics of the songs we sing glorify God. They direct our hearts to Him for who He is and what He has done. They also clearly show us our true condition before and after salvation. Now, if contemporary worship music can do that then I see no problem with it.
I have seen people leave a church because they hated the “contemporary” music and worship. They wanted hymns and hymns only. Well that is not really the point is it as I explained above. But I did talk it over with my former pastor before my wife and I left that church because it went PDC. He refused to have hymns os psalms used as part of worship because he wanted to attract the “unchurched.” Anyway, you know my stance on that.
Now what about your question about the immature always having their way. Again, this is a leadership issue. The leadership of the church needs to educate the people, discipling them, so that they seek to worship and serve God according to His will, not theirs. You are right about this possibly becoming a can of worms.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Mike, thanks for the reply. And yes, I wasn’t talking about the PDC’s rationale for using contemporary music. That is an entirely different ball game in which I think we will find complete agreement on. I have certain concerns with regards to this matter and manner of worship, but I think it would rather off-topic to mention them here.
Thanks Mike for the advice. Will do! I’m really looking forward to it! I met another reformer in the store today! Their new in town so I passed on the news. Maybe they will show up,too! For your glory God let it be a good place to worship our Lord!
Let me know how it goes Deb.
I sure will!!