Character Assassination and Conformity to the World

by Mike Ratliff

Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.” To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. (Romans 12:19-21 ESV)

In yesterday’s post, Watch Out for Those Who Cause Divisions, we looked at the fact that it is the duty of all believers to serve the Lord by being good soldiers, ready for battle to stand and contend for His Truth no matter the cost. Today we will look at the right and wrong ways this is done. It is vital for the apologist to know the truth and that is found only in God’s Word. Yes, some godly Christians speak and write truth from God’s Word, but the primary source for us is the Word of God. This is why it is vital that believers sit at the feet of good and godly teachers of God’s truth that they may know and love His pure doctrines. I have seen so many good Christians attempt to stand up to apologists for some man-centered version of our faith, but they are not prepared. This usually ends badly. The reason this happens is that these good people use tactics born in the flesh rather than from the humble, and wise heart that is submitted totally to the will of God. The enemy is an expert at inciting people to react emotionally to what they perceive as wrong and this can lead to snippy arguments that produce only bad fruit.

I have many rules for commenting on this blog. For instance, I will delete comments that contain attempts to discredit someone else by using a personal attack. For example, a few years ago I wrote an article using scripture and some quotes from Martin Luther. The quotes from Luther were used primarily to get his take on what the scripture passage said in light of the subject of the post. However, one fellow did not like what the post was about nor did he care too much for my blog, the ministry of CRN, or me in general. Instead of using exegetical arguments to show that I was wrong in using those passages to make my point, this fellow attacked the character of Martin Luther as well as mine. He ignored scripture and went to discredit me personally and indirectly by showing that Martin Luther was all sorts of things that he felt cast him in a bad light. He accused me of not being too bright plus many other things that I do not care to go into right now. In any case, not one of his arguments cast any doubt on the truths in those scripture passages or my exegesis of them. His tactics were designed to discredit me personally and indirectly by trying to do a character assassination of Martin Luther.

It was from that experience that I developed the rules we still use on this blog. There are many opponents in the visible Church to God’s Truth. They hold to man-centered non-doctrines mixed with enough Biblical truth to make them look appealing to the naïve. These fellows cause divisions in the visible Church. They sell their version of Christianity packaged in slick packages that rival that of any entrepreneur. I am convinced that many if not most of these fellows believe that they are right. They are not knowingly doing evil. Their problem is that, if they are genuine believers, they are not very mature. They are still convinced that our salvation is all about us and what we can do instead of about God for His glory alone. They have a huge problem with the Sovereignty of God because that cramps their concept of personal freedom. None of these things are the unforgivable sin though and we must remember that. On the other hand, those who hold to a version of the Gospel that is unbiblical, and there are many, are simply servants of our enemy.

That summary does not even come close to describing all those with whom we must contend. However, it should give you an idea of what we are up against. It is vital that our approach to “reasoning” with these people be done from a Christlike countenance. What do I mean?

Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good. Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor. Do not be slothful in zeal, be fervent in spirit, serve the Lord. Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. Contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality. Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them. Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly. Never be wise in your own sight. Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.” To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. (Romans 12:9-21 ESV)

We are to love one another. We must so abhor evil that even if those with whom we contend treat us evilly, we never repay accordingly. No, we leave the vengeance for this evil in God’s hands. We return good for evil. We tell the truth. We do not use their tactics, which are based in the ways of the world. Character assassination is their main tool, but we must not use it. There are so many times that I want to participate in discussions on other blogs or websites in which several “believers” are going at it against some apologist for what we consider to be wrong, but I refrain because the verbiage has already descended into escalating diatribes against the character of all involved. It is one thing to show the person with whom you are reasoning where they are wrong using scripture and godly wisdom, and quite another to resort to telling him or her that they are evil or stupid or vile or insincere or whatever. You get the idea. Never contend with these people on this basis even if they do so for this is conformity with the world. I know this because I have made these mistakes myself and have ALWAYS regretted it. It is far better to simply speak God’s truth in love than to argue based on character.

Now, don’t get me wrong; there is nothing wrong with contending with these people as you answer their jibes and insults by not allowing them to continue dirtying the water. This is the time to end the “discussion.” Warn them that you will not participate in that sort of thing and end it. Pray for them that God would break through the darkness in their hearts, drawing them to Himself as you move on. If you remain in the “discussion” then be forewarned that it is descending into fruitless arguing and you will more than likely suffer the loss of joy because you are operating in the flesh. This only hardens hearts and makes enemies.

Our Lord Jesus Christ most certainly referred to the scribes and Pharisees as a “brood of vipers” (Matthew 12:34; Matthew 23:33) as did John the Baptist (Matthew 3:7; Luke 3:7). Does this mean that we can do the same thing when dealing with those that prove by their words and actions that they are apostate? These religious leaders opposed the ministries of both John the Baptist and our Lord. Some of them attributed the work of the Holy Spirit to Satan and, therefore, committed the unpardonable sin. However, we are not John the Baptist a Prophet of God nor are we omniscient like our Lord Jesus Christ. We are commanded throughout the New Testament to contend earnestly for the faith while also forgiving those who persecute us, praying for them, and returning good for evil. No, we have no license from our Lord to be name callers or to resort to character assassination in order to “win.” My brethren, this is hard. This is not normal for anyone, but is only possible for the mature, Christlike believer. How do we get there?

I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (Romans 12:1-2 ESV)

Do you see the contrast the Holy Spirit had Paul write here? Those who are on the right path of spiritual maturity present their bodies as living sacrifices to God as their spiritual worship. This is holy and acceptable in God’s eyes. This means that we are not our own. We may be insulted or put down or falsely accused by those with whom we contend, but if we are living SACRIFICES then we are not self-focused at all, but are totally focused on God and His glory. The contrast is that those who do not do this are conformed to this world. They operate according to the ways of the world. They are self-protective. They are not humble, but are controlled by pride. However, those who are NOT conformed to this world are the opposite. They do not use the methods of debate that the fleshly do. They do not use character assassination, but rely only on God’s Truth in their reasoning.

How do they get there? They are transformed continually by the renewal of their minds. This is speaking of being immersed in God’s Word as a way of life. This is being in prayer and worship as one’s coram Deo. This is how we grow and mature as Christians. This does put us in circumstances that test us according to this. This proves us and matures us and then we grow in understanding and wisdom so that we know what the will of God is, which is always good and acceptable and perfect.

My brethren, what I have shared here may not be popular with some apologists, but this is our calling. We cannot bring glory to God by using the tactics and ways of the world. No, we are to take the high road of conformity to the character of Christ. Then we will be able to stand in the hottest battles, running full bore into the thickest part of the fight to contend as our Lord commands, but we never use any weapons but those given to us by Him, which are His wisdom and knowledge tempered by love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, and self-control.

Soli Deo Gloria!

17 thoughts on “Character Assassination and Conformity to the World

  1. Pingback: Character Assassination and Conformity to the World - Reformata

  2. Mike,
    It is easy for my flesh to act out it’s desires to “strive” with the lost and other brothers. Seems a great deal on parts of this site has resulted in ‘one upping’ another and making up coined names to humiliate the flesh of other professing believers as well as some false teachers or brothers teaching wrongly.
    When discernment works out in the flesh it is ugly and sharp, I know… I have read back over things I have written in the past years and it makes me sick to think I thought at the time I was using God’s gift wisely.
    I would like for Ken to really soul search, I have asked him privately to stop the name coining and the online back and forth, sometimes in the past it has been very public and online with another’s wife, but it seems to just continue.
    When will he have said enough to Richard A. to feel like he is done???
    I don’t expect you to post this… but I’m not blind to what has been taking place here. I love your gentle, non ‘striving’ ways… they reflect the Spirit working rather than the head knowledge taking over and a wrongly applied gift.

    1 Timothy 5:19-21 (King James Version)

    19Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.

    20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

    21I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality.

    No one is above this passage.

  3. Brent,

    I have learned that the “arguing” stuff does nothing but escalate the conflict. It hardens hearts and incites malice. I am guilty of it, but I have learned to STOP IT now after much prayer and soul searching. I will not cease pursuing the Truth though. I will still contend with those who seek to subjugate it. Thank you for your frank comments Brent.

    In Christ

    Mike Ratliff

  4. Mike, I appreciate all you, Ken, et al. have done and said on these subjects. Always praying for you all.
    Brent, have you said the same things to those who have denigrated Mike and Ken?

  5. Brent,

    I do agree with what you said about the truth and I also agree that we should not seek revenge or always try to “get even.” I do agree with that, but we must never stop contending for God’s truth, to contend for the faith in a way that is not about us, but about God and His glory out of love and concern for the Body of Christ. We confront evil or apostasy for those reasons and no other. If our motives are otherwise then we will usually fall into that ‘tit for tat’ thing you mentioned. Let us never stop contending, but do so for the right reason.

    In Christ

    Mike Ratliff

  6. Brent, I agree, it’s not tit for tat. But if you think that needed to be said to Mike, it certainly needed to be said to those whom Mike and Ken have written about. If you think Mike is guilty of something, how much more so are those he writes against? If you have followed any of the links in any of the blogs, you have to have seen the vitriol spewed towards Mike and Ken and all who would dare to defend them. Right? Share the condemnation equally, unless you really think Mike, Ken, etc are actually the only guilty parties.

  7. Jim W. I thing you need to re-read Brents comments. I don’t see where he is condeming Mike at all. Actually, I thougt it was quite complimentary. I love your site as well Mike. And I actually agree with Brent. I understand contending for Truth as it must be done but some of the fighting on the comments sections on blogs goes beyond truth. We get into name calling and drive by snipes. Even if someone else dips this low are we supposed to act in the same manner? Maybe we should just walk away and wait for the Lord to defend us. And I am not condeming anyone. I am guilty as well. We look bad to our Christian brothers and sisters as well as to the watching unsaved world. I don’t see anywhere in scripture where we are allowed to act in this manner and plenty of scripture saying we are not. If someone has a blog that speaks ill of us maybe we should just stay away. The Lord will deal with that person in time as He sees fit.

  8. Jim,
    I never once mentioned Mike as a ‘guilty party’ to anything. I agreed with Mike’s writing and leading of the Spirit in it. Ken has already said anything in the beginning to point out all the things wrong with the way Richard A. handles things he doesn’t agree with. I don’t know much about Richard A. , but like I have said I have read many of Ken’s writings that I think have been led and written with the Spirit guiding it, but as of late, much has been mixed with street level tit for tat not Truth for Truth.
    Now it has become a public tit for tat. Enough, I would like both to stop not TRUTH stopped, the petty, unspiritual stuff. I expect more from Ken, since he has a proven record of Truth.
    If we think we are to rally around the TRUTH and that alone, we are right, but if it is a rally based on our friendships or people in spite of the TRUTH then we are setting ourselves up for error mixed with truth and a conspircy to overlook TRUTH alone for personal reasons.
    Don’t anyone get a false impression here about what I wrote, I wrote this above about Mike and his writings,
    ” I love your gentle, non ’striving’ ways… they reflect the Spirit working rather than the head knowledge taking over and a wrongly applied gift.”

    I agree with Paul in Spirit when he instructed correctly and it should not be disobeyed by any of us with the power of the holy Spirit to give us full control over the things we write and speak. I have said, I have sinned against it in many of my writings.
    THIS should give us a Spiritual outline of everything we write:
    2 Timothy 2:24-30 (English Standard Version)
    24And(A) the Lord’s servant[a] must not be quarrelsome but(B) kind to everyone,(C) able to teach, patiently enduring evil, 25correcting his opponents(D) with gentleness. God(E) may perhaps grant them repentance(F) leading to a knowledge of the truth, 26and they may come to their senses and escape from(G) the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

    We say we are His servants, but everytime we do other things mixed with this, we are not serving Him at all… whether it is me, Ken, Richard or anyone else who isn’t being led by the Spirit at any given time. I will fail, sinfully and others should be there to correct, encourage, rebuke and lead by example, without “preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality.”

    Peace in Truth (no matter what is going on that others are doing) and there is no peace outside of that.
    His love to all,
    Brent
    Again, I have written many things in the past that I am ashamed of, I am not coming to some high minded ‘loving’ position above the ‘fray’ and able to pick out specks from my brother’s eye’s, I have had large planks of sin removed from mine own eyes by the correction and chastisment of the Lord. In the flesh, I don’t desire the correction, but the Spirit in me demands it.

  9. Sorry, Debbie, I don’t see that at all in Brent’s comments. He as much as admits it in his response to my first comment. Just to be clear, I agree with what you have said about “dipping this low”. That is almost precisely what I said to Ken in an e-mail. The thing is, neither he nor Mike nor anyone who has agreed with Mike and Ken, have done those things (at least not that I’ve seen, but I certainly could have missed it). Instead Brent has taken the time to write a not-so-subtle chastisement of Mike. My question remains: If Mike deserves what Brent wrote-how much moreso do those on the other blogs? As I said, there was an incredible amount of hatred and name-calling and just plain spite being voiced by the “other guys”. So, once again, Brent-and anyone else who believes Mike is wrong in his writings, preach it to both sides. I believe Mike, Ken, et al are preaching a needed message, a good message and I have no problems with anything either of them have written. Could they have done a “better” job at times? Who knows? The written word is sometimes tough to figure out-as evidenced by our (mine and Debbies) -disagreement with what Brent actually meant.

  10. Mike knows I have not in one way or another said or written anything towards him, period. Never did it enter my heart to have any problems with what he has written on this subject let alone have I ever disagreed with anything he has written in the past that my mind could even remember, period.
    That should clarify this part of this discussion, period.
    Again, love and TRUTH above the personal apsect of these dicussions.

Comments are closed.