by Mike Ratliff
Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way. And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth and bring to nothing by the appearance of his coming. The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 ESV)
Sola Scriptura is under heavy attack in the visible Church. Some of those who are leading this battle against it are already predicting victory. The central theme of Phyllis Tickles book The Great Emergence is, “Where is our authority?” This question is asked in order to stress the need to do away with Sola Scriptura in order to make way for “the step and subsequent journey out of traditional church expressions and into new ones.” She also said that there are forty-four specific events that underline the move away from Sola Scriptura and that it’s not if Sola Scriptura ends, but when…
The attack against the authority of God’s Word is nothing new. The Original Sin (Genesis 3) was instigated by the serpent, who is Satan. In Genesis 2: 15-17 we read the account of God putting Adam into the Garden of Eden and His command about what trees he could eat of and the one he could not.
The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Genesis 2:15-17 ESV)
After this God created Eve and put her in the Garden with Adam as his wife. She was under the same mandate. Her and Adam were under the authority of God’s Word. He commanded them to enjoy all of the trees and their fruit except for one, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If they disobey this command and eat of that tree then God warns them that they will die.
Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1 ESV)
Notice the subtlety of Satan’s attack. His innuendo was designed to create doubt in Eve’s mind to cast God into the role of one denying her and Adam of something. This same question is the one being asked by anyone who attempts to move the Church out from under Sola Scriptura, which states that it is only through God’s Word that we can know the truth for it is His truth. Some are rather blatant about their rebellion such as Tony Jones and Doug Pagitt. Rob Bell and his wife have stated that they no longer believe in Sola Scriptura. They prefer to have their faith defined rather loosely with no straight and firm lines around absolute truth. Others are more subtle such as Rick Warren who twists scripture and takes passages out of context in order to support his unbiblical teachings. This is also a form of “Yea, hath God said?”
False prophets are those who take truths from God’s Word, add to them, take away from them, and misuse them for their own purposes. This is part of the rebellion that began with The Original Sin in Genesis 3. It is a denial of God’s Word being complete and inerrant. It is a denial that God’s truth is sufficient for us. It is a throwing off of Sola Scriptura in order to claim that which is denied by it. God’s Word tells us quite a bit about sin and His Holiness, Righteousness, and Justice. Homosexuality is just one of many sins that are explicitly defined in God’s Word. In our day, however, there are many advocates of “gay rights” that are demanding that homosexuals be given special rights and protections not only in society, but also in the Church. This is part of the rebellion against Sola Scriptura because God’s Word does condemn this sexual perversion as an abomination. I have had some atheists wanting to debate me on this subject, but have refused to do so. I explained my position on this subject and why I have taken it, but they refuse to back off of the original question. That is not debate, but badgering. To continue in it would be akin to casting pearls before swine or that which is holy to dogs.
In any case, my brethren, as I sat in Church this morning listening to an excellent sermon on Genesis 3 it was as if God focused my attention on v1. The temptation to sin started with Satan’s question, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” Then before I began working on this piece I read this post from my dear brother in the Lord, Ken Silva. Then I read this comment from my friends Paul and Luann on my post Counterfeit Christianity. The words “lie” and “rebellion” were running through my mind. I looked up several passages having to do with The Original Sin and the Great Deception that is coming upon the whole world prior to the return of our Lord. I have asked many theologians what they thought was the lie that was believed by the wicked in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 (I placed this at the top of this post). I have received some very good answers and a lot of non-committal answers. I do not know what the specific lie is, but I am leaning heavily towards it being based in this battle to do away with Sola Scriptura. That which is a lie will be believed to be true. Isn’t this what Phyllis Tickle and all those of like mind are actually doing? They are casting away God’s truth in favor of a lie, which is that truth is not absolute and, therefore, the Bible is not authoritative in the life of the Christian or in the Church.
As I stated earlier, this battle is not new. It began in Genesis 3 and God’s people have been in it since. The move towards Christian liberalism in the 19th Century, the fundamentalist backlash against it, the demise of mainstream Christianity, and the corruption of that part of the Church called “Evangelical” are all part of the history that has led us to this mass rebellion against Sola Scriptura.
The willingness of so much of the visible Church to give in to these attacks is quite disturbing. This is taking place because of the utter lack of biblical discernment in it. The average professing Christian is biblically illiterate and their pastors do not feed them the truth. Therefore, those who do not know the Lord, who are still in their sins, but who believe they are Christians because of their heritage or religiosity are the very ones who believe that Sola Scriptura is actually an evil thing that keeps people in bondage to some ancient standards that are no longer relevant in our society. On the other hand, those smooth talking pastors with their slick, man-focused churches appear to be what is good and right in the church because they tell their people what they want to hear while never confronting them with the truth from God’s Word about sin and the soon-to-come wrath of God.
Yea, Hath God Said? The answer to that is to preach the Gospel to the ones asking it. God will save those who are His as we do this. The rest will remain in their sins even though they worship another Jesus and serve him according to their own made-up version of Christianity. These are no different than pagans, atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, or anyone else who is bound up in the idolatry and rebellion of man-made religion. We are going to hear this question a great deal more in many different forms the longer the Lord tarries. We must continue to pray for the lost that God will save them. We must continue to teach and preach the truth while confronting and rebuking those who teach and preach lies.
Even so, come soon Lord Jesus!
Soli Deo Gloria!
Amen Mike! We agree. Everything seems to be man made these days. Man made bibles, man made churches, man made preachers, a man made Jesus. And are they all in trouble or what!?!?
Amen Paul and Luann!
Pingback: Twitted by jmikeratliff
Mike,
An area of the Christian life where this is also ignored is the teachings of Christ on marriage and divorce. What pastor wants to stand and say “no” when someone comes to them wanting to justify their feelings about divorce? This has been an absolute tragedy in the visible church today. My own life and that of my 3 adult children have been ripped apart by the decision of my wife to “be free to be herself,” all the while making the process as antagonizing and agonizing as possible. Where is the preaching from the pulpit on this? It is sadly missing and the psychology of self has replaced “what did God say>”
Amen John. I remember your ordeal. I see you are still “in it.” I am deeply sorry about that brother and I agree that the spirit of compromise in the leadership of the visible Church has created this. No one wants to preach or teach anything anymore that could possibly offend someone. This is not only unbiblical, it is stupid. Again, I hurt for you and your family and I pray that God will heal those wounds.
“… those smooth talking pastors with their slick, man-focused churches appear to be what is good and right in the church because they tell their people what they want to hear while never confronting them with the truth from God’s Word about sin and the soon-to-come wrath of God.”
Well said. The visible church, made up of the unregenerate and undiscerning, heaps up these false teachers because they teach what people want to hear. As Paul Washer preached, it’s God’s judgment upon them. The wolves and goats want the same thing, and it’s not God.
Thanks Brian, and Amen brother!
I’ve been reading Kingdom of the Cults by Walter Martin, his chapter of Spiritism was eye opening. It looks as if Emergent teachings are nothing more than Spritism supplemented with very loose interpretations of scripture. In a way it is good for them to completely throw scripture away because Christians will begin to see what they actually are and will hopefully know to flee.Given time Emergent Christianity will probably morph into a cult in the same way that Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormons did. They lack a central prophet figure at this momemnt but it looks like they are trying to find that. Churches really do need to seek out good Biblical teaching to combate this.
Amen Les!
I guess I am going to be the lone voice of this thinking here. The crux of the matter is this, I reject the teaching of two churches, one visible and on invisible. There is one acceptable word “the ekklesia” the called out ones. I reject the teaching that there are two Israels, one spiritual and one physical. I reject that there are two salvations, one spiritual and one physical, I see it as one salvation to the uttermost! I am sure I could use additional examples. I have been listening to RC Sprouls lately on our local radio, he has been covering this subject of “The Church”, did anyone by chance listen? Did you hear him turn himself into a theological Greek and Hebrew pretzel, justifying the use of the word “Church” vs. “The called out ones”? Did you hear him admit a black eye to “The Church” when Catholics and Protestants burned people at the stake and put them on torcher racks? You know what he said? He said ” the reason “The Church” did this, is because they really believed in Hell back then”!!! Can you just think about that for a minute?!! My 27 year old daughter has just turned her life to the Lord, she is now reading the Bible and seeking God, she attends a reformed Presbyterian Church near us, what do you think she is going to think when she hears this? When Jesus walked this earth he did rebuke the apostate religious leaders of his day, but he spent far more time suffering the little children to come unto him, for such was the kingdom of God. In fact he said about the religious leaders of his time “let them be! The blind lead the blind and they both fall into a dicth!” I wish your focus was more on saving the “called out ones” rather than the so called “visible church”, which is no church at all. I wish people would pray for the peace of the spiritual Israel, rather than the so called physical, visible one, which is no Israel at all! I hope my sayings weren’t too hard, yet that is what I sincerely believe.
Robert Begnaud
Robert,
You are the one tying yourself in pretzels.
Sorry, but the teaching of the invisible and visible Church refers to the fact that the ecclesiastical, physical representation of the Church we see in the world is the visible Church and it is made up of both the regenerate and the unregenerate. That is all that means. On the other hand, the invisible Church is the elect, the true Church and contains no unregenerate people at all. I listened to R.C. Sproul talk on this subject before and I don’t recall him saying it like that, but I am fallible and so I won’t be dogmatic about that either. In any case, Robert, I am sorta confused why you have chosen to be deliberately antagonistic about this post since it really had nothing to do with your comment.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Please keep on preaching, Mike. Many of us are being tried and yet we long to hear the Truth! As difficult as it is to see that people who once claimed to be Christians are now rejecting Sola Scriptura, our Lord warned us in advance. We must stand fast and obey Him, regardless. We must continue to preach from His Word, believe His Word, be in His Word…
God bless you always,
Heather
Thank you Heather!
What I have found confusing is this;
WHAT did Jesus & the apostles believe concerning the doctrine of Sola Scriptura?
Would it not have been that the INSCRIPTURATED word of God was INFALLIBLE, INERRANT, etc., BUT that this did not make God MUTE, as they themselves were, in their daily lives hearing God speak to them in events such as the NT records, eg Peter’s vision of the unclean beasts on the sheet, etc.
HOW are we able to SCRIPTURALLY justify our contention that God never again spoke to His people as soon as the NT canon was complete? How can we show that Peter’s ‘MORE sure word’, ie., the Church’s infallible RULE of faith & practice, ie., the plumb-line by which every private reception of a word thought to be from God is tested (Isa 8:20) makes a claim that there CAN be no such thing any more, that today we do not have the communicating God the people in Bible days enjoyed?
thanks for your comments
Allan, since it is impossible to definitively answer your question SCRIPTURALLY then we must look at from how God works with the Revelation He has given us, which is His Word. How does God speak to HIs people now? Isn’t it through His Word, through the preaching and teaching of God ordained ministers of His Word? He also guides as we pray and seek His face. He directs our paths, etc. However, is there new revelation? No, there isn’t for then how would we know that the person speaking it or writing it is really giving us God’s Truth? Well, all we can do is check it out with Scripture not ever Man’s common sense, etc. One is infallible while the other is like melted wax. Forget it. No, we must compare all prophecies with the Word of God. Since this is true then how could there be NEW REVELATION? If it was new and not found in any form in the Word of God then we know that what we have is probably heresy. On the other hand, if a person speaks a prophecy, but it is the same thing that we find in God’s Word then do we really need it? Prophecy in our time is the godly, interpretation of God’s Word by His ministers and teachers.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff