The Aim of Our Charge

by Mike Ratliff

τὸ δὲ τέλος τῆς παραγγελίας ἐστὶν ἀγάπη ἐκ καθαρᾶς καρδίας καὶ συνειδήσεως ἀγαθῆς καὶ πίστεως ἀνυποκρίτου (1 Timothy 1:5 NA27)

But the aim of our charge is love out of a pure heart and a good conscience and faith without hypocrisy. (a personal translation of 1 Timothy 1:5 from the NA27 Greek text)

Before you read this post, if you have not read last night’s post, The Knowledge of God, please do so. It is also imperative that you listen to Chris Rosebrough’s and Phil Johnson’s analysis done to the interview of Rick Warren done by John Piper which I linked to in that post. I have read the posts and articles out there from quite a few well-meaning brothers and sisters in Christ who deeply desire for the controversy or rift resulting from the negative response from many of us who cannot accept Rick Warren’s ecclesiology and his friendship with the world and its ways to be healed. They view the efforts by John Piper to be the very thing to “heal” Rick Warren’s image with us. However, they are overlooking something that a commenter on last night’s blog said very well. He said:

“These “interviews” are meaningless and are usually not an accurate revelation of a person’s unvarnished beliefs. Watch what a person does apart from staged interviews and you will see more accurately, what he believes. What a person does is what he believes; everything else is just religious talk.”

There you go. Compare that with what the Apostle Paul said in the passage I placed at the top of this post. The genuine Christian walks with a heart that contains the love of God and that love flows outward. Our part is to walk in repentance so that our conscience is good. We do that by walking and relating to others by faith and that means without hypocrisy. If a person professes one thing, but his or her actions are quite different then you have a case of hypocrisy. That is our charge against Rick Warren in this case. He can do all the interviews with John Piper he wants. He can say he loves Jonathan Edwards and John Calvin all day, but that changes nothing. If he is not willing to turn from being ashamed of the Gospel and offended by the Cross of Christ and thereby not preaching the Gospel instead of promoting ecumenicism with partnership with Roman Catholic mystics, among countless other things that I do not have the space to go into here, then I will not relent.

Most of those who are asking for us to relent and seek peace with Rick Warren like Tullian Tchividjian in this post, say we cannot “judge” anyone unless we know them. Wrong! If a person is teaching heresy, I do not have to know them. I just have to know what they are teaching. I compare that to what God’s Word says and if it fails the test, then I follow Biblical protocol and expose them to the Church if they do not repent of it. Honestly, as I read Tullian Tchividijan’s post I was simply amazed at how thickheaded his reasoning was. How could anyone who admits to knowing what the Gospel is and what true biblical ecclesiology is say they like Rick Warren who has done more damage to both in the visible church than anyone in this age?

I also read a blog post by another man that I have a great deal of respect for that I will not name who asked for prayer for that interview. I have no problem for that. However, his post was from the position that we should pray that both men, being highly influential men in the Southern Baptist Denomination and the worldwide Church, we should pray that this interview would bring peace and make both of their ministries even more influential. I did not take that very well. I did not pray for that. I prayed for God to take that interview and open the eyes of God’s people to His truth and how the ministries of both men were outside of the clear bounds of what He commands of the leaders of His Church. Therefore, I will repeat what I said way back when Rick Warren’s keynote speech was given at the Desiring God conference. I said that this was a gift from God because Rick Warren had finally exposed himself to us for the heretic he really is. Since then John Piper has worked very hard to resurrect Warren’s image with us. This interview has done absolutely nothing to cause me to say things like, “I like Rick Warren now, despite the fact that I disagree with him on many things.” No, sorry, I cannot say that.

Soli Deo Gloria!

14 thoughts on “The Aim of Our Charge

  1. Good for you, Mike! I walked away from that knucklehead the moment my former life coach er pester trotted him out. What is certain to happen, is more will follow Piper’s peck of pickeled pesters. Otherwise they would have to admit they were wrong, and join that uncompromising narrow road crew, when it is easier to draw a crowd from the broad road. As I have said before, the broad road to destruction runs right down the center isle and through the bull-pits of the vast majority of churchianity today…and the people love to have it so!
    Easy street has always been paved with good intentions, but good intentions are man’s ways, God’s Way is not man’s way..EVER, till we are conformed to Him.

  2. That is very perceptive Mickey. The pressure coming from so many pastors in the SBC right now is to chill out and just go with the flow, et cetera. I am so glad that I am no longer part of that circus.

  3. “These “interviews” are meaningless and are usually not an accurate revelation of a person’s unvarnished beliefs.
    Amen Mike!

  4. Thank you for upholding the truth, Mike. I pray that others will have their eyes opened. I also agree with you strongly that the statement made by the man who wrote, “we cannot judge anyone unless we know them” is not biblical. We don’t see that qualifier in the Word.

    It is strange to me that someone would think so highly of himself as to conduct an interview to resurrect someone else’s image, as you put it —- as if asking a few questions and getting some “right” answers declares all to be ok now.

    I wonder why didn’t he ask Warren about his connection with Dr. La Verne Adams and the forward he wrote in her book? Does he think she is doctrinal too? Or are we supposed to forget about that “other’ stuff he is involed in.

  5. Pingback: Another well-known name defends Warren | Defending. Contending.

  6. Ok so how is this any different than questioning Mike Horton for his patting Warren on the back here:
    http://www.whitehorseinn.org/blog/2010/06/23/video-posted-horton-at-saddleback/

    “I appreciated the generous spirit in which Rick asked the questions and encouraged me to lay out the case we have for a new Reformation. It’s great to be able to discuss our differences as well as our common convictions in a spirit of friendship as well as mutual challenge.”

    Just wondering… can we say yet that the term Reformed is losing its meaning?

  7. Well Paula, the differences are abundant and if you had bothered to listen to the White Horse Inn broadcasts after the fact then you would know that no one there endorses what Rick Warren is doing nor are they doing anything to validate his ministry. In fact, they continually bring into question his methods and show clearly that what Warren calls his gospel message is not the Gospel. Horton is far nicer to Rick Warren than I would be. He is a very gracious man. I just couldn’t do that, but he can and I appreciate that because that means he can actually get in there and interview the man whereas I could never do that.

    On the other hand, John Piper is going out of his way to try to make Rick Warren look like something he is not. Totally different. Horton is not, nor would he ever do that. What John Piper’s motivation is is beyond me right now, but can’t be good unless he is attempting to get Warren to repent, but that doesn’t seem to be the case from what I heard.

Comments are closed.