by Mike Ratliff
14 Ταῦτά σοι γράφω ἐλπίζων ἐλθεῖν πρὸς σὲ ἐν τάχει· 15 ἐὰν δὲ βραδύνω, ἵνα εἰδῇς πῶς δεῖ ἐν οἴκῳ θεοῦ ἀναστρέφεσθαι, ἥτις ἐστὶν ἐκκλησία θεοῦ ζῶντος, στῦλος καὶ ἑδραίωμα τῆς ἀληθείας. (1 Timothy 3:14-15 NA27)
14 These I write to you hoping to come to you quickly; 15 but if I delay, that you may know how one ought to conduct oneself in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth. (1 Timothy 3:14-15 Possessing the Treasure New Testament V1)
When Paul wrote his first epistle to Timothy that we call “1 Timothy,” Timothy was the pastor of the Ephesian church. Ephesus was home to the pagan temple to the goddess Diana or Artemis, which is considered on of the seven wonders of the ancient world. One of its features was it pillars. It contained 127 pillars, every one of them the gift of a king. All were made of marble and some were studded with jewels and overlaid with gold. Not only did each pillar (στῦλος) act as a tribute to the king who donated it, all of them together, obviously, had the function of holding up the immense structure of the roof. Therefore, Timothy and his flock at Ephesus would have certainly grasped Paul’s analogy. What exactly was he telling the church about its true mission?
Over the last few weeks we have been inundated with a very ugly attack by men who are very confused about two things. The first is that, to them, the truth is fluid, not set. That means truth is relative, therefore, doctrine becomes something like modeling clay or Silly Putty that can be applied as one sees fit to not be offensive to anyone. Read, Political Correctness. The second thing they are confused about is the Church’s role as the στῦλος καὶ ἑδραίωμα τῆς ἀληθείας, the pillar and support of the truth. Let’s look at these words.
The first word, στῦλος (stylos) is a pillar. That is very straightforward. It serves one basic purpose even though it may be decorated and looked upon as something else. It exists to hold up a structure. Paul links it with “καὶ” (and) ἑδραίωμα (hedraiōma), which is a buttress or support. It is not the foundation and Paul is not saying the Church is the foundation of the truth because the Church did not invent the truth. Instead, the Church is the mainstay, the prop, the support, the buttress, the propagator of the truth. While the pillars in the temple of Diana were a testimony to the error of pagan false religion, the church is to be testimony to God’s truth.
Therefore, when error is being propagated and called truth in Christ’s name, we MUST NOT remain silent, but make sure that the truth be made known to the Body of Christ instead. Even though some leaders of the Gospel Coalition were upset that many of us were pointing out the truth about ER2 and it aftermath, that is the function of the Church. We are the upholders of the truth. To stay quiet in the face of what if false to maintain a modicum of peace is hypocritical and the opposite of what we are called to do.
The truth as we see in the imagery Paul gives us here shows us that our mission is the exact opposite of what is loudly proclaimed in most of today’s churches to be “user-friendly,” “purpose-driven,” and “seeker-sensitive.” We are to obey God and just preach the truth.
Soli Deo Gloria!
Just removing the pillars is what they do!
http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=3377
I think you are right Mickey…
I recently, heard as opposed to read, that the commenter (Mike Horton maybe on a recent podcast?) said that Charles Finney was the cause of the burned over districts, because of the flame on flame off nature of his methods. I wonder, are the soup the Church is in with virtually anyone or anything being accepted going to cause the 21st century burned over district?
And Mickey, I’m glad I just restocked on antacid…..
Thanks again for a fine post Mike, I’m really glad to have you back in the saddle.
Signed,
(insert age group here) (insert racial group here, only if non-white) (insert denomination or theo-identity group here)
Indeed “the church of the living God” is the pillar and support of the truth. But who is the church? Elephant Room participants would say that they are. Same for the Gospel Coalition. Same for “most of today’s churches.” And, of course, you, too. To whom are we to listen?
It is not being a Trinitarian or a Modalist that makes you a part of “the church of the living God” but rather hearing and doing the word of Jesus Christ. He is Lord! Listen to Him.
They are “man pleasers” didn’t MacDonal say you have to love Jakes more than doctrine? So where do you stop? Warren, Sweet and so on and so on?
You are welcome Michael. I think you are right about the analogy.
Mike Gantt, and it is hearing and doing the Word of truth, which is the Word of God, that we learn the Doctrines to uphold like the Doctrine of the Trinity. The Word of Jesus Christ and the Word of God are the same. The Doctrines we are willing to stand firm and support to the end are those our Lord gave us. Compromise to be more inclusive is what the ER people are doing, therefore, we oppose them and will continue to do so until they either stop or go away.
Val, Show me in the Word where our Lord says we have to love heretics more than His truth… No, you have it right. That is why we stop that nonsense right here.
Mike Ratliff,
What you and the ER people have in common is that you think you can define who belongs to the Lord. I remind you that “The Lord knows those who are His” and “Let everyone who names the name of the Lord abstain from wickedness” (2 Tim 2:19).
We who seek to serve the Lord by proclaiming His name should remember that it is not our place to declare who and who is not the Lord’s; rather it is our place to declare who and who is not the Lord.
Stated another way, we are not to proclaim the people of God so that others may join us; rather we are to proclaim God so that others can join Him.
You are confused about something Mike Gantt. I never once have said I know who are the Lord’s and who are not as in sheep, but I know what the Word says about knowing false shepherds by their fruit… I agree completely with your last sentence, but I have nothing in common with the ER people. I seek the purity of the Gospel to be proclaimed as the Spirit leads. They seek to include everyone who professes that they are Christian even if it is plainly obvious they aren’t. Do you see the difference now?
What has happened in the Church that we are concerned with her truth, his truth, our truth and not concerned with coming together to hash out HIS truth? In the group I am in, if one teaches on something or holds a belief and has made it public and someone challenges it, we study to show ourselves approved. We come together with the Scripture that backs up what we have stated, and the other brings the Scripture that makes them think we are off. What we are MOST concerned about is HIS Truth. We do this lovingly, not to prove ourselves right, but that we know what His truth is, because THAT is what is leading us and guiding us. Church Leaders today seem more concerned with preaching a new teaching than with proclaiming the gospel. This new type of leadership style is more important than the concerns of those in the flock. This is happening on every level. Jesus prayed for us in John 17, that we might be one, as the Father and Son are one. Yet, the New Church today wants to live by the slogan: Let’s agree to disagree.” We are told to not be ignorant to the schemes of the devil. 2 Timothy 4:1-5
Amen Marilyn!
Mike Ratliff,
I appreciate your response but you are continuing to miss my point. That is, once again, in your your last sentence, you reference your disagreement with the ER people about who is a Christian. My point is that this question doesn’t matter. The question that matters is who is Christ?
I’m not missing the point Mike Gantt. I know perfectly well who Christ is and why knowing that matters. It is obvious that anyone who mishandles the Gospel does not know this. Those who mishandle the Gospel are disingenuous and that is the point I am making. You are trying to change the subject to a “Doctrine doesn’t matter” point and if that is indeed it, then this conversation is over.
Mike Ratliff,
I am most certainly not trying to change the subject to “doctrine doesn’t matter.” Doctrine matters very much. Rather, I have been trying to point out that it’s doctrine about Christ that matters, not doctrine about us. But if you were really focused on Christ you wouldn’t be a Modalist or a Trinitarian for both of those points of view distract from the biblical doctrine of Christ.
Wrong Mike!!! For it is the Doctrine of the Trinity of which the Doctrine of Christ is very much a part. You cannot split off the Doctrine of Christ from the Doctrine of the Trinity. This is why a wrong view of God produces a wrong view of the Gospel, which produces disingenuous professing believers who are all about self rather than the glory of God. Now do you understand?
Mike Ratliff,
I understand you all too well. It pains me to hear you subordinate the doctrine of Christ (a scriptural doctrine) to the doctrine of Trinity (a man-made doctrine). Scripture says Christ is to have first place in everything; how then can He be the second person of anything? Scripture says that Christ is to have the preeminence; why then do you subordinate Christ and give preeminence to a man-made philosophical conception? Modalism and Trinitarianism are vain imaginations. Return to your first love – Jesus Christ – and He will show you who He is.
Mister Gantt, it pains me to say that you are a heretic who subordinates the Doctrine of God, which is not man-made at all, to the Doctrine of Christ. Christ Himself is God so why are you trying to split him off from the Godhead sir? You have shown your true colors. This conversation is over. I will pray for your repentance.
In this I think we see the next chapter in the mystical christ of the last days…
The interaction between Father and Son, and Jesus saying He must leave so that we may receive the Comforter is quite Trinitarian by any measure. While I follow Jesus alone and no man, and while I give Jesus the Pre-eminence He is due and most certainly has, for “He must increase and I must decrease,” this in no way negates the triune nature of the supernatural Godhead in 3 distinct persons. Yes, I am a man, a father and a husband, as some would want to analogize, but that is no analogy for the Trinity of Our Lord.
We must be ever watchful for the tricks of the deceiver as he co-opts the words we use to attempt to describe what is indescribable.
Amen Mickey!
Hey Mike, Another great post. Too bad the Oneness and Jesus Only keep coming with their presuppositions but they will not take the time to accurately read what you have stated in your posts in order to have a meaningful discussion regarding what the Bible really has to say about the Trinity. In spite of their vociferous claims to remain with doctrine that comes from Scripture they sure do not want to interact with the text of Holy Scripture. No biblical exegesis, no biblical hermeneutic…just platitudes and logorrhea.
That’s it exactly Michael, and thanks brother!
1 Cor.3:11″ For no one can lay ANY foundation other than the one already laid which is Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the Cornerstone of our faith and life-Eph. 2:20-”built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone.”, 1 Peter 2:6
The very, sad part about Oneness pentecostal groups and Jesus only groups are that they don’t realize that it (IS essential to salvation) to place your faith in the One True God as revealed in Scripture or you cannot be saved. Christianity is an Objective faith based upon an historical FACT and if you have your faith in the wrong Jesus then you’re lost and bound for hell. John 1:12-13 makes it very clear that we not only BELIEVE but we also RECEIVE. That’s the infinite difference that sets true genuine believers apart from ALL faiths. Believing and receiving Jesus who is God, shed his blood, rose bodily from the grave and sits at the right hand of the Father is the ONLY ONE who can take away all our sins.
Many people think its no big deal and why all the fuss- this is what I fear especially with the ER2 that has blurred and belittled the very Character of our Triune God of the Bible. This is such a travesty because many people will end up in hell because they thought that their faith and being sincere saved them.
–Jesus said~~”Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent”-John 17:3.
Jesus said that HE is the one who reveals the Father (Mat.11:27 and Luke 10:22) “All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him”
If the Oneness Jesus reveals the God of the bible as modalism teaches, then they have a counterfeit Jesus. THAT Jesus is an impostor and cannot reveal the Father because he’s not real and he’s powerless to do so. This Counterfeit Jesus cannot wash away anyone’s sins since he never existed to shed his blood at the cross. An impostor is unable to reveal the Father because he’s not the Unique true Son begotten of the Father as Scripture clearly teaches. There’s only ONE TRUE JESUS and HE is the ONLY ONE who saves.
I say all this for anyone who is a oneness, Jesus only and is sincere to please ask God to reveal to them the truth of who the real Jesus is according to Scripture so that they can be saved
all gods of our imaginings cannot save us.
Amen Linda!