by Mike Ratliff
That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, as it is written, “I have made you the father of many nations”—in the presence of the God in whom he believed, who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist. In hope he believed against hope, that he should become the father of many nations, as he had been told, “So shall your offspring be.” He did not weaken in faith when he considered his own body, which was as good as dead (since he was about a hundred years old), or when he considered the barrenness of Sarah’s womb. No distrust made him waver concerning the promise of God, but he grew strong in his faith as he gave glory to God, fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised. (Romans 4:16-21 ESV)
In our last post, Liberal Theology , we had a protracted discussion with a proponent of Liberal Theology. The discussion became quite heated at times. This person insisted that scholarship and critical analysis of the Bible far outweighed faith when it comes to theology. In fact, he tried very hard to make us see that the Bible is unreliable and cannot be understood or held by Christians to be the infallible, inerrant Word of God.
As some of my friends from around the blogosphere joined the battle, he soon “tired” and left when it became obvious that we would not accept what he was “preaching.” He gave some parting shots that were intended to do some damage to our faith. The one that stood out to me became the basis for this post. He said, “No, I encourage you to continue in your faith. Hold tight. Don’t let go. But I think that over time you will find that it is kinda like trying to hold on real tight to a handful of sand.”
Is that what we are doing? Does this describe our faith? In my research of Liberal Theology, I ran across testimony after testimony from liberals who explained how and why they abandoned orthodoxy to become liberal. Some even said that it “saved their life” or “preserved their sanity.” In this post, instead of addressing what liberals believe about faith and reason and certainty, we will look at these things from the Biblical view.
For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void. For the law brings wrath, but where there is no law there is no transgression.
That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, (Romans 4:13-16 ESV)
In v16 we have this phrase, “That is why it depends on faith.” What does “it” refer to? The answer is found in vv13-15. It is the “promise.” The promise comes by faith. What does “by faith” mean? Back in v13 we see that the promise comes through the righteousness of faith. We do not err by saying that the promise is through faith or that it comes by faith, but in v13 Paul is giving us more. This chapter in Romans is about Justification by faith. For those who are fuzzy about what that means, think of it as the righteousness which saves you was given to you. It isn’t anything you inherently had in yourself. It was a gift. Of course, this righteousness is Christ’s which is imputed to all those who trust and believe apart from works. The promise in v13 is that all in Christ are heirs of the world through the righteousness of faith.” Carrying forward our understanding of Justification by faith then we see that our inheritance of the world is ours through the righteousness of faith, which is through righteousness of God credited to our account through faith. (Romans 4:5,9,11)
Now, back to v16. What is “by faith?” It is the righteousness of God that obtains the promise for us “by faith,” This faith is through the righteousness of God, not something we have to conjure up ourselves. Through this faith, we believe. We trust God’s promise to us. This promise was obtained for us by Christ. God imputes His righteousness to us through this faith. It is on the basis of this imputed righteousness, the promise is secured for us that we will be heirs of the world.
In v16 we see the phrase, “That is why.” Some translations render this as “Therefore” or “For this reason.” What does this refer back to? We find the answer in v14. “For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void.” The reason the righteousness that obtains the promise is “by faith” is that if it were by law, then the promise would be void. Why? “ For the law brings wrath.” If we try to use the law or good works for God so that we will have righteousness before Him, we will fail. Why? Only wrath is available to those who operate by the Law. Why? Justification is by faith alone. The best we can do prior to faith is self-wrought rebellion. This is not acceptable righteousness before God. (Romans 10:3)
Let us paraphrase v16 from what we have learned here. “Since trying to keep the law as a way of justification only brings wrath, therefore, the righteousness that does obtain the promise for believers is by faith, not law or works.”
The next phrase in v16 is, “in order that the promise may rest on grace.” Just as works and trying to keep the Law nullifies the promise and only brings wrath, it is by faith and according to grace that we are justified. Why is it important that the way to inherit the promise rests on grace? It is that it “be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all.” Those who adhered to the law are believing Jews. Those who share the faith of Abraham are believing Gentiles. The reason the inheriting of the promise of being an heir of all things “rest on grace” is so that the promise be guaranteed or certain and sure and unshakable. If it was according to works or by keeping the Law then it would be according to people’s efforts. No, it must be by grace or our faith would be like trying to hold onto sand with our hands.
Now we come to certainty. This is where atheists and apostates and liberals focus their attacks against our faith. I had one fellow tell me the other day that if our faith was a gift from God then how could we ever have assurance. His understanding was that unless you maintained your faith by doing good works then you would always be in doubt. Since doubt isn’t one of my problems I pondered this for a few weeks. Then we had our “discussion” today and it was as if it became time to nail down why those with this genuine saving faith are so certain.
We do have certainty in the promise of being an heir of the world. We know it will come true even though we are currently imperfect, stumbling, believing, justified, sinning saints. To be certain in spite of our temporal condition requires us to obtain the mind of Christ. We do this via the Word of God, prayer, meditation, and obeying Him. Paul promises us in Romans 4:16 that our inheritance is sure. It is guaranteed. Here it is again.
That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, (Romans 4:16 ESV)
Here are the three steps of Paul’s reasoning. “That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring. “ Here we see it clearly. Our salvation and future inheritance is by faith…grace…guaranteed promise. Do you see now why we stress that our preaching of the Gospel must be based on justification by faith apart from works? Our salvation depends entirely on God’s grace. Our faith is essential, but the reason it is essential is that it is the only condition of the heart that rests on grace.
The only way that our eternal future can be guaranteed is if it rests on God’s grace. Grace is free. It cannot be earned or deserved. It is by His grace that he brings His people to glory. God is the one doing the mighty work that guarantees our inheritance. Grace is the foundation of our guarantee while faith is the only condition of our hearts that rests on it.
Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, (Romans 4:4-5 ESV)
Look carefully at Romans 4:4-5. The phrase “counted as a gift” is the same as “in accordance with grace.” Paul makes it crystal clear in this passage how to be justified, how to have a righteousness before God that will ensure our inheritance of the promise. What is the opposite of grace and faith in this passage? The opposite of faith is works. The opposite of grace is due. If we try to work for righteousness instead of trusting God then we will get our due or wage. That due or wage is not in accordance with grace nor does it rest on grace. It is the opposite of grace. On the other hand, if we do not try to work for our righteousness, but, instead, trust God, who justifies the ungodly, His righteousness will be credited to us as a gift. This is grace and the only condition of the heart that rests on it is faith.
What condition of the heart “rests on” this grace? Faith alone! Faith is the restful experience of the work of grace in our lives. This is why those who are maturing are never doubtful, desperately grasping for faith like trying to hold sand in their hands. Those who take up God’s armor, wear it, and use it can stand firm and not fall away even in the thickest part of the battle. God’s grace, dynamically working through our armor as we maintain our godly focus, enables us to never compromise or give way to the enemy.
Faith is to grace what seeing is to light and what hearing is to sound and what waking up is to the alarm clock. Faith corresponds to grace the way tasting sweetness corresponds to honey on the tongue. – John Piper
God’s grace actually awakens our faith. It is through His grace that those who are spiritually dead are quickened. They are made alive in Christ. They are new creatures. This is not humanly possible. No amount of work on our part can accomplish this. No amount of education or study or devotion can cause a spiritually dead person to become alive in Christ. This is the miracle of the New Birth.
And you were dead in the trespasses and sinsin which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. (Ephesians 2:1-10 ESV)
We are saved by grace through faith. This faith rests on grace, it accords with it. This grace gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist. God’s sovereign grace guarantees, in spite of our sinfulness and frailty, that we will inherit the world. This is certain. Those who mature in Christ as God’s grace moves and works in their hearts will develop a faith that never doubts. It sees statements like, “No, I encourage you to continue in your faith. Hold tight. Don’t let go. But I think that over time you will find that it is kinda like trying to hold on real tight to a handful of sand” and wonders at the darkness in the heart that wrote it. Of course that darkness is both the product of and the source of their Liberal Theology.
Soli Deo Gloria
This post was partially adapted from a sermon by John Piper titled The Faith – Grace – Certainty Connection.
Is it true that liberals often say that they want to make the Word of God, “culturally relevant?” I believe that I have heard pastors from the ecumenical movement saying this. This is a disguise to tailor the scriptures to what the other religions believe, which has nothing to do with culture.
Culture does not affect the gospel. The Bible is culturally relevant to all cultures. It is not to become relevant to Islam, Buddhism, New Age or any other false idols. Chinese people eat rice and fish. The gospel is already relevant to that. Mexicans eat beans and burritos and tacos. They speak Spanish. The Bible comes in Spanish. It is culturally relevant to Mexicans and Chinese people by itself.
I am aware that many Mexicans pray to Mary, but that would not be a culture issue, but an issue with compromising Biblical truth. Not all Mexicans are catholic and not all Mexicans pray to Mary. So now the issue about praying to Mary becomes a Biblical issue instead of a cultural issue. It is possible to eat burritos, tacos, and not pray to Mary.
Sorry Mike, I am tired because I have been working all day, and now I am laughing at my own blog. Am I misunderstanding liberalism?
Josh
Good post, Mike. I have mentioned this point (against both Emergents and Liberals) before in my blog and others, but anyway, nobody seems to want to offer a response: How can the liberals be so certain of their uncertainty? And why they are not practicising what they preach? If they really do not believe in certainty, they should just shut up and listen to others who know the truth.
Mike, it’s no accident or coincidence that in my search for a friend’s site here, I came across yours the other day. My dad has been preaching on living by faith for many years now. His “seminary” experience comes from he and my mom having lived Israel’s wilderness experience when I was a child, and continues to this time. He often says that people of “my” generation (I’m 35) and younger have never seen “normal” Christianity!
I’ve really appreciated your posts this week.
Josh, no you aren’t misunderstanding it.
Amen Daniel!
Carrie,
Your Dad is 100% right my sister. I was born in 1951. My grandfather’s generation was just beginning to die off when I was a young. He was a preacher. My parents know what it is to live by faith. They aren’t perfect, who is, but they recognize the spiritual bankruptcy of our time within the Church.
Also, I believe God is reviving His remnant at this time to turn their hearts to Him and live by faith. This was the “Message” God gave me back in 2004 to teach and preach and write about. I guess I’m a little like Tyndale, always singing one note.
In any case, your comment really blessed me and I would really like to meet your Dad, to sit at his feet and learn. You are very privileged to have had him as your Dad.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Mike, Maybe I’m a little of base but oh well… a few days ago it finally broke thru my skull that GOD is sovereign in a way I had not understood before. The only reason we can be sure of our salvation is because GOD is sovereign. GOD can do what HE wants when HE wants the way HE wants. GOD is not restricted by time, space, knowledge, power, wisdom or any other thing. Even thou I’ve been enjoying learning about GOD for twenty-nine years I don’t seem to be anywhere near where a lot of people are. Just think of all the fun I’ll be having as I learn more about our eternal GOD.
Captured by HIS grace, Gene
Amen Gene, yes God is Sovereign and you are blessed by Him revealing this truth to you.
Your answer to Carrie is so true Mike. We sure do live in a time where we have to live by the faith He has given us because the ‘churches’ have gone totally goofy! I can remember even as a little tike the churches were standing room only and everyone from town went to the 3 or 4 that was in our town. Now, they are closed and the town is a ghost town. And where there are churches……they don’t go anymore. Empty pews everywhere and sometimes you can understand why…..shallow, very shallow dead preaching (if you could even call it that). I have a question for you Mike, do you ever or did you ever feel ‘guilty’ when you tried to find a sound church and you couldn’t so you just stayed home? Did you wonder if that was what the Lord was wanting you to do? What do you do if there are no sound churches around? Not perfect by any means, but atleast even 1/2 way sound.
Paul,
Church going can be a form of self-righteousness or idolatry. However, God does want us to be parts of local fellowships. Now, we must work very hard in keeping out bad theology, etc. from them. When we can’t then we withdraw and wait for God to guide us to the right church. That is what we did.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Mike, wonderful article, thank you for reminding us of the importance and often overlooked ‘ingredient’ in the salvation process, it all starts with God’s wonderful undeserved favor; His free grace. So many eliminate this grace, and replace it with man-made hoopla, nullifying what might have been. May God continue to bless you, and all who are truly saved by His Amazing Grace!!
Mike,
Last Sunday morning I linked to the WI church site you have posted and I found a reformed church only 14 miles away! God willing ,I will go there next Sunday.
You are very welcome Laurie!
Awesome Deb, let me know how it goes!
When we remove the majestic mystery that is Christ and His church we remove faith. And that is what some would do today, remove the miraculous and the spiritual essence of God’s eternal plan because they refuse to bow their knee and worship the Risen Christ. The Seraphims themselves cover their faces before Jehovah and yet these dreamers speak great and swelling words of the flesh to their own peril.
Argument is their meat and unbiblical duscourse their milk, but their dessert will be served one day from the very God they so freely malign. I take no pleasure in the future of the wicked, however God is recording ever word even on some obscure blog like my own. You are faithful, Mike, and it will not be your words specifically that will one day honor God before His throne, it will be your faithfulness because in the end it will be revealed that it was all of Him anyway.
May the Lamb that was slain receive the reward of His suffering, and may the words of truth spoken by an unprofitable servant waft up before all of heaven and glorify the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, even from a blog servant!
Tired? Hah! Not even close.
Since civil discourse is not longer possible I must (and this next part must be said in a pseudo-French accent) taunt you a second time.
Amen Rick!
Well, well, well, you are sure a mature individual Brian. I saw your last two posts. I think I agree with Deb about you, “puffed up and full of yourself.” You are so proud of your “intellect” that you “think” you have when all along the things you hold dear and hold up as eternal in significance have no more value than the coffee grounds I threw away this morning. Your friend says we are insane. Well, isn’t it amazing that you pretend to follow Jesus when the things He spoke of about how things will go for those who live for Him are exactly as they are? We are seen as “insane” because we reject all of the world’s values. We tell you the truth and you return the favor with trench warfare “graces” and vindictiveness.
I allowed you to comment here. Consider that privilege pulled.
Lastly, for all who have not read the “dialog” from Liberal Theology, I suggest you go read the post then the comments. It will take awhile, sorry. Then read Brian/recycledchristianity’s comment on this post. Then go read Tim Brown’s post Simple, Way too Simple. Doesn’t that describe what has been going on here? By the way Brian/recycledchristianity is Emergent. Should tell you something about their unregenerate thought processes. The first picture in that post is a bit scary, but it does reveal the level of maturity we find in these folks, sorry to say. In any case, let us continue to pray for them and never give an inch.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
You can also go to Brian’s very own blog and see very well what he is up to. Personally, I think he’s bored for lack of company so he’s trying to get supporters for his cause.
Brian,
You said : Oh hell, if I have to spend eternity with such bores I’ll take the devil. At least he/she is interesting.
You should know as he seems to be your master.
Amen Deb!
Interesting comments/”discussion” on the other thread. The biggest assumption I see is that God exists “out there somewhere” but has zero interest in the affairs of this world, nor can we possibly have anything resembling a personal relationship with Someone Who we cannot see. This is merely modern-day deism, and is nothing new.
Deism of course leads to all sorts of problems, including the remaking of ‘God’ in our image, when in reality according to Scripture, we were created in His (Gen. 1:26). The logical result is so-called ‘belief’ in a ‘god’ who is powerless. He could not possibly have inspired (God-breathed – II Tim. 3:16) or moved His people to write the Word He gave (II Peter 1:21), and is powerless to have preserved His Word (without errors) to the present day. Therefore, the Bible as we know it has no relevancy beyond the pick-and-choose things we decide we “like” and therefore agree with. These include things such as “God is loving and merciful” (which is obviously true), to the exclusion of His other attributes such as holiness, righteousness, and the expectation that as Christians, we should be holy as well (I Pet. 1:16).
Of course, therein lies the problem with such thinking: how then do we choose what in the Bible is “true” or “truth”? If parts of the Bible are merely stories or allegories, then who is to decide which parts should be accepted as fact or not? The pope? The preacher? The philosophy teacher? This slippery slope leads to secondary assumptions and misconceptions such as “all truth is God’s truth”, “all roads lead to God”, and the idea that ‘what’s right for you might not be right for me’ or ‘a loving God wouldn’t … (send unbelievers to Hell, etc.)’. Those who hold to the fundamentals of the faith (e.g. the inerrancy of Scripture) and the exclusivity of the Gospel today merely need to be ‘enlightened’, ‘more objective’, and broaden their minds to every other “religion” and philosophy out there. After all, other philosophies and religion might have part(s) of the truth, too, and isn’t the Jewish God the same as the Muslim God, the same as the Christian God?
Real Christianity, however, is not “religion”, and all “Gods” are *not* the same. Religion is *always* man’s attempts to make himself somehow “good enough” to get to (his religion’s version of) God, heaven, etc. – the “good” outweighing the “bad” of their lives when it all comes out in the end. Genuine Christianity begins and ends with a merciful, holy God who reached out to fallen, sinful man in order that He might call to a personal relationship with Himself those who will simply trust Him. This relationship is impossible without the Holy Spirit’s regenerating work and a turning-around (repentance) and yielding to His control. It requires an implicit trust in the Creator that goes beyond just believing He is “out there somewhere”.
The people from the generation before mine knew this, or at least it was more common. Today we are bombarded with everything from the easy-believism of the so-called social ‘gospel’ to the skepticism that leads pastors (and most missionaries) to feel the need to tell everyone what their “need” is, then tout it as so-called “faith”. I’ve heard over and over “How can God supply my need when I don’t tell people what it is?”. Who, then, is this God in whom they profess “belief”? Is it the God of the Bible, or is it people? Do we really trust Him, or not?
Sorry Mike, I don’t mean to blog your comments … but these are some things I was thinking about.
Very well said Carrie! We are living in a time of total rebellion against God. Of course there is His remnant who has not fallen away nor bowed the knee to some other god. He always has preserved His people, the genuine Church.
Now is the time for us to get very serious about our walk before the face of God. We are being prepared for something. All we have do is get into some hand-to-hand combat with the likes of these emergent apostates and it it becomes clear in hurry that what used to be viewed as vile and evil is held as good by them. They view all who hold to the faith as insane. I never thought this would happen in my day, but we are in it now.
You can write here all you want Carrie.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Thanks Mike.
Every time I hear (implied or overtly) that fundamentalists are insane, it immediately brings to mind I Tim. 1:7. In the context of the chapter, people of faith (such as Lois and Eunice – v. 5) who believe the Gospel and hold fast to it are the ones of sound mind. It then follows that those who do not are the truly insane.
Amen Carrie!
Dear Mike,
You have a good heart and a great passion for the Word of God. You have made a scholarly defense of salvation by faith alone. But Paul’s statement concerning “the works of the law” (Romans iii. 28) has been misinterpreted. What Paul was addressing was the works of the Mosaic law which included all the statutes of the Jews – like the law of the meal-offering, the law of the sacrifice, the law of the beast and of the bird, the law of jealousy, the law concerninng the red heifer, etc.
Paul wraps up his series of statements (Romans iii. 27-31) by saying that: “Do we abrogate the law through faith? Not so, but we establish the law.” Also: “For not the hearers of the law are justified by God, but the doers of the law shall be justified” (Romans iii. 13). Also that: “God will render to every man according to his deeds” (Rom. ii. 6).
It is the law of the DECALOGUE that is to be lived, and that law is fulfilled by charity, which is love to the neighbor (Romans xiii. 8-11); thus not by faith alone.
True religion is walking with God. Faith alone means there is salvation while remaining in your seat. Love is faith in action. Personal merit is not an issue if the Lord is sincerely approached for help and guidence in a humble manner and knowing that we are powerless without him.
This topic is a big one but my plate is full for the moment.
The God Guy
http://www.thegodguy.wordpress.com
the god guy,
No, it has not be misinterpreted. For what you said to be true would violate what Paul wrote just a few verses before in Romans 4 when he said that if we attempt to be righteous by keeping the law then all we will get is wrath from God.
What then shall we say was gained by Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but trusts him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing of the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works: “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not count his sin.” Is this blessing then only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We say that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness. How then was it counted to him? Was it before or after he had been circumcised? It was not after, but before he was circumcised. He received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. The purpose was to make him the father of all who believe without being circumcised, so that righteousness would be counted to them as well, and to make him the father of the circumcised who are not merely circumcised but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised. For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void. For the law brings wrath, but where there is no law there is no transgression. (Romans 4:1-15 ESV)
also…
We ourselves are Jews by birth and not Gentile sinners; yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified. (Galatians 2:15-16 ESV)
The Law is lived out in those who walk by faith. That is what Paul was talking about in Romans 3. We don’t keep the law to earn favor from God. The Law is our teacher that we are unrighteous. This passage in Romans 4 that you are saying is misinterpreted cannot mean what you say in light of this.
In Christ
Mike Ratliff
Christ is the end of the law to everyone that believes. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. Who also has made us able ministers of the New Testament, not of the letter, but of the Spirit; for the letter killeth but the Spirit gives life. For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remains is glorious.
To follow the law in any form makes Christ a priest after Moses.
For if He were on earth He should NOT be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law, who serve unto the example and SHADOW of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for See, says He, that you make all things according to the pattern showed to you in the mount. But NOW has He obtained a better ministry, by how much also He is the mediator of a BETTER covenant which was established upon BETTER promises.
The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin IS THE LAW. We as believers are to be obedient to most of the moral law of Moses but not as the OT law, but as the New Covenant written not on tables of stone but by the Spirit on the tables of our hearts. How turn you again to the beggarly elements? Throw OUT the bondwoman and her son! Tell me, you that desire to be under law, DO YOU NOT HEAR THE LAW?
The law is never separated in the Bible, that is man’s invention. Paul says if you do one part you must keep ALL of it. The Galations desired part of the law as did James, but the New Testament is clear, we live Christ not the law. We give God glory for the OT law for it was a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. The glory of the law was its weakness in that incubated within the law was an inherant weakness that would be fulfilled when Christ came. So when Christ came His glory exposed the eternal weakness of the law, all of it.
Christ does not share His children with the law of Moses, we follow Him because He has made us new creatures created in His very image. He is our elder brother and it is He and not the law upon which are devoted eyes remain. We are in glorious bondage to our wonderful Master and not the law which has been done away with. Christ has made us free indeed in Him!!
Amen and Amen.
Amen again Rick!